Original stories from Antony Hudson and film and TV reviews as well as general topics of discussion.
Friday, 29 May 2020
The Written Podcast: Keeping My Mind Active
Wednesday, 27 May 2020
TV Show of the Week: Upload
Monday, 25 May 2020
Mum's Monday: The House by the Lake by Thomas Harding
This book is about a real-life house in Berlin Germany and the five families that live there over one hundred years.
Prologue, first it is sad to read that the ‘Berlin wall’ was built between house and lake. Now when the Grandson of the last owner was exploring the house the description reminded me of a ‘Before’ scenario in the BBC television program ‘Homes Under the Hammer’ with Martin Roberts. There have been some rundown properties before they then get renovated. However, in this case I hope the house can be saved. In the program all we see is the immediate state ‘Before and after’. We very rarely hear of any history connected with the properties. This book is like the equivalent of reading the history of one of those houses. I am already fascinated.
Part one, Chapter one, 1890, they commonly say that ‘You learn something new every day’, today is no exception, it turns out that in Germany and other European countries, the lime tree is considered sacred and it protected against bad luck. This is interesting to read.
Chapter two, 1913, despite the date in the title of this chapter, the chapter quickly goes into 1914 and beyond into the First World War and after.
Chapter three, 1927, it is interesting to read of the construction of the house, it sounds lovely and yet modest. I am glad there is a picture, it is nice to put an image to the description.
Chapter four, 1928, it is lovely to read about how the family spent their days at the house. Also, now as Berlin is prospering. I can see why the family is spending more time at the house/haven. Again, it is nice to see photos in this chapter.
Chapter five, 1929, the chapter starts with a tragic accident. This chapter is not nice to read with the outcome of the Will reading and the consequence of the ‘Wall street crash’ in New York for Germany.
Chapter six, 1930, at first I thought Elsie was a bit ‘Self-centred’ but then it became clear she just missed her family and was acting like a typical sister as in going to miss her sister but wished her well. I like that Elsie followed her own heart and swapped being a doctor for journalism. This did put her in the position of being in the centre of the events of the day. Because of this it does, it seems, make it easier for the author to interweave what was happening into the history of the families at the house.
Chapter seven, 1934, a commonly known term is ‘As one door closes, another door open’s’. In this case some of the land around the lake has been sold off to make way for Germany’s Luftwaffe, and it is sad that the family that was living there has now moved away. It is an ‘End of an era’ as they also say.
Chapter eight, 1934, It is sad to read that the family have now moved to London, leaving the ‘Lake house’ for good under the circumstances of the time.
Part two, August 2013, I like that this book includes the research, however, tragic it is in it. Although this book doesn’t need the proof it is interesting to read it as the proof is there and it has been very thoroughly carried out.
Chapter nine, 1937, after a length of time in which the house was empty there is about to be another family take up the lease. It is nice to see that the house is going to be lived in again. It turns out the house makes for a perfect, relaxed weekend retreat for an exhausted, successful film actress, her successful husband who writes music for films and their son.
Chapter ten, 1937, I can see the reasoning of the security and freedom of owning the ‘Lake house’. It is sad, however, that one family had to lose it and the Second World War was going on around it at the same time.
Chapter eleven, 1942, it is lovely to read that a song was written about the house. What is sad to read though is that almost all the previous catalogue was destroyed in the war bombing. After this and the theatre also bombed and that one and all others closed, it is sadly, enough for the family to leave Germany and hand the keys over to another family to look after the house.
Chapter twelve, 1944, I can see why the lake house and the surrounding village could be seen as a ‘Safe haven’ but sadly nowhere could escape the war.
Chapter thirteen, 1945, at the start of this chapter it is so nice mentioning that the telephones were still connected and the radio broadcasts could still be listened to but by the end of this chapter it is not at all nice to read as the Soviet soldiers have arrived in the village.
Chapter fourteen, 1945, during this chapter, although I have also noticed this being mentioned in previous chapters that quite a few of the things that happened during the Second world war and after it is followed by how far it is from the lake house. This keeps the house very much connected so, I feel, for the purpose that we don’t lose sight of as the focus of this book. Sadly, the house has now been abandoned again and it is sad to read that the family missed out on buying the security of the land with the house they wanted. It is a mixture of happy and sad news of what happened to the Alexander family.
Chapter fifteen, 1946, there is good news in this chapter, the house and the land now belong to a family. I am pleased and happy to read this part after all the awful things that was written previously. It seems the house is still of interest having been part of a ‘Denazification’ trial. This is a good example of things/events coming back to haunt a person, luckily the outcome was a good one. It is a shame the same cannot be said for Germany/Berlin or the lake house with the ‘Blockade’.
Chapter sixteen, 1948, it seems the house was situated right next door to an air field that was used during the ‘Berlin airlift’ this supplying much needed food and supplies to the deprived people and places. There is more history to this house than just the families that lived there. The house was certainly well placed to be in the centre of things back then. It is annoying though to read that the ‘Denazification’, I can only describe it as ‘Red tape’, didn’t go through.
Chapter seventeen, 1949, I don’t want to comment really about this chapter, although it is written in this book, it is still not at all, let’s just say, correct what is happening. Something that is good news that is almost lost in this chapter is that Will Meisel receives and frames his Business licence.
Part three. December 2013, again this part is notes on the research on the house. I am both surprised but understandably not surprised by most of the reactions the author is receiving whilst requesting information. It shows that a house can just be a house but it is the living families that tells the living heart of it as a home.
Chapter eighteen, 1952, from this book I can learn a lot of the history of how Germany/Berlin was divided up in the time leading up to the construction of the Berlin wall. Sadly, the house by the lake is looking its age. It is good that it is occupied, if only by a ‘Caretaker’ family that is, I am glad, following the rules of the owner regarding his belongings.
Chapter nineteen, 1958, it seems the lake hose is going to be full of people as two families now are living there. It is nice that once again the house is recognised as ‘A better place’ similar and in keeping with the previous description of the term ‘Haven’. The house is evolving as building work and alterations have been carried out on it. It makes me feel cold to even think about having to wash/bath outside during the winter. Although it is a little sad to read the bigger picture of being ‘Better’ must be thought of, so the family is happy in the long run then that’s fine.
Chapter twenty, 1959, in a previous chapter it was mentioned that the house sewage went into the lake, this is ok as a temporary home. In this chapter with the house being now full time occupied, the inevitable happened and sadly, the lake suffered because of being overwhelmed by full time sewage.
Chapter twenty-one, 1961, it was a shock to read that, to wake up one morning and find a wall being built. Also, it was sad to read, although the piano was stored away the music and clothes were either thrown away or given away. And yes, what good is a ‘Lake house’ with no access to the said lake? Not good.
Chapter twenty-two, 1962, it is nice to read that the alterations to the house makes it more spacious for the now one family that lives there.
Part four, January 2014, again the research continues. I like reading about where some of the past residents of the house ‘A where are they now, what are they doing’ scenario, even though sadly, there is medical issues for one previous resident. I like how the cousins have shown enthusiasm for the house showing a disconnect from the history of it makes for a connection to want to see it preserved and an interest to learn about it.
Chapter twenty-three, 1965, in this chapter we read of a ‘Royal visit’ which is exciting for the west. Also despite the border guards ‘Kids will still be kids’ although dangerous and certainly not good/right this is weirdly amusing to read.
Chapter twenty-four, 1970, it is nice to see the family fall into a routine at the house. They still had to be careful with the border guards despite a friendly camaraderie built up. it is sad that as once the house was referred to as ‘The house by the lake’ it is now referred to as ‘The home by the wall’.
Chapter twenty-five, 1975, at the start of this chapter I thought I would eventually be writing about a successful athlete living at the house, but sadly, an accident changed everything. This was skipped over quickly, but I suppose what is done/has happened, has happened, so there is not really much more to say. This chapter however, by the end there is good news as in a wedding and a baby.
Chapter twenty-six, 1986, after turbulent times at the house a new marriage could be seen as good news. I love that there is a picture of the tiles in the house. The description is good, but a picture is still better.
Chapter twenty-seven, 1989, all I can say about this chapter is the Berlin wall is coming down. Overall it was a nice chapter to read.
Chapter twenty-eight, 1990, despite the wall coming down there is still, you could say conflict, as who owns the house by the lake and what land was theirs and what the land was made into, what can only be described as a ‘Public footpath’.
Chapter twenty-nine, 1993, it is lovely to read that a previous resident was able to visit the house, even though this was sadly, after some tragic loses in her personal life. Even so a bit of nostalgia can be good sometimes overall.
Chapter thirty, 1999, I like that the house is still lived in, but how, with the parties, is questionable. The two young lads had their fun but, and I guessed it couldn’t last long. It seems the house has had a mixed history from respectable holiday home, through equally respectable full time tenants to a bachelor pad. As fun as the latter sounds for the two lads as in best things it comes to an end and the house is now empty again.
Part five, February 2014, the research continues. I would like to have known more about Roland the last resident of the house, about what he is doing now and so on, but at least he provided some information. It is sad to read of the first initial ruling but hopefully after a ‘Clean-up day’ the pretty little house will look better for it and convince a change of heart.
Chapter thirty-one, 2003, this chapter is really not nice to read, squatters have basically, ‘Trashed’ the house. This is so sad to even think about let alone read.
Chapter thirty-two, 2004, I can see why the family next door used the lake house garden also I can see why the other neighbour objected to that. Now it seems a race against time to save the house. Not exactly ‘Edge of your seat’ scenario, but I would like to know how it would be saved.
Chapter thirty-three, 2014, it is lovely to see ‘’Clean-up day’ such a success. I loved reading about the response and the sense of community.
Epilogue, it is lovely to see the house saved and to read the recap of the story.
Postscript, yes, here’s to the next ‘Hundred years’’.
Wednesday, 20 May 2020
Film of the Week: Stargirl
I will admit, I only came across this film when I was checking to see when the first episode of the DC show on the CW with the same name was going to air its first episode with consideration in these unprecedented times, and considering we don’t get many feel-good musicals compared to other genres, I gave it a watch.
The film is an adaptation of Jerry Spinelli’s novel of the same name, and the first thing I made a mental note about was how I could instantly see why Disney picked up the film rights, because it is quintessentially Disney. The second thing I noticed was the lack of it being a musical, until it showed me the unique way it was including the musical numbers and then I understood why it was labelled so.
In pretty much every musical ever made, and parodies of musicals in various ways also, there’s no discernible source for the music, it just pops up out of nowhere, the characters start singing and dancing, and all is right in the world. In this film, it provides a source for the music and reason for dancing. This reduces the number of musical numbers by a considerable amount when compared to many other musicals. Whereas the others would have a song at the beginning to introduce the audience to the characters, Stargirl waits until twenty-minutes into the film before having a song, and it’s incorporated within the halftime show of a school’s football game. In total, Stargirl has only 4 songs; 5 if you include the short and sweet happy birthday Stargirl (played by Grace VanderWaal) sings to the main character, Leo (played by Graham Verchere); 6 if you count the song sung during the end credit scene. To put that in comparison, Anna and the Apocalypse – a film of the same length – has 13 songs, and even the Phineas and Ferb episode, Rollercoaster the Musical had 12 songs and that was only half-an-hour long; so you can see why I first thought Stargirl was mislabelled as a musical.
This was Grace VanderWaal’s feature film debut, and there were times when the role she was required to play seemed a little too advanced for her first time acting. Her character has the entire film on her shoulders, and at times it was evident Grace felt the strain. But she shined when it came to the musical numbers. In short, the story keeps the mysteriousness of Stargirl’s character strong, but Grace doesn’t always capture what the story needs. Not much complexity was needed when it came to Leo’s character – Graham had to basically nail sympathy and curiosity and that was it, which he does well, and there’s no point in talking about his friends because the film barely includes them.
But there is a big but coming. This is a Disney film, created as a light-hearted family-friendly adventure but mainly aimed at the kids. Whilst it’s easy for me to sit here and state what I feel about the film, none of that matters because I can see the appeal it will have on the children. It has a strong morale interwoven between the story – and rather cleverly, if you look at it from their perspective, the kids won’t focus on Graham’s friends so why should the film do so, too. Just have him interact with them when needed but keep the main focus on the two characters that ultimately drive what the main lesson forward.
In conclusion, this film isn’t my cup of tea. It falls short a bit, and I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone my age and over, but I can certainly see the appeal it will have to the demographic it’s designed for. It’s a quintessential light-hearted family-friendly Disney musical film, enough said.
Thanks
for reading
Antony
Hudson
(TonyHadNouns)
Monday, 18 May 2020
Mum's Monday: The Darkest Hour
This film is based on true events of Winston Churchill (Gary Oldman) during World War Two. The atmospheric nature is cleverly done, giving depth to the era this film is set in.
There is a well-known phrase ‘That behind every great man, there is a great woman’. In this film this is very much high-lighted in the well-acted portrayal of Winston’s wife Clemmie (Kristin Scott Thomas).
A part that could be deemed as inaccurate is when Churchill goes to the king (Ben Mendelsohn) to become the Prime Minister. Winston talks, in the words ‘Your Majesty’ to the king first. Now I always thought the protocol was that no one spoke until after the king or queen had spoken first.
This is not so much a war film just a film set during the war. This is cleverly done and shows that a film about the war doesn’t have to have many, if any actual fighting scenes. The script describes events without visual representation. Also it is strange to see a war film without hardly any action scenes.
Not only am I glad that Miss Layton (Lily James) was given another chance it is heart-warming to see the connection between her and Winston.
This film also high-lights even more the importance of ‘Dunkirk’ and rescuing the troops from the beaches. This is all done by script, which is really clever and extremely well done.
There are some amusing parts one is when they lose the Prime Minister to the London Underground. Also I absolutely love the reference to the modern day saying that ‘All babies look like Winston Churchill’ this is so amusing, light-hearted and on topic. I love how in this film Winston asked some public/people how they felt and what they would do.
Overall this film does and history has shown that yes, Winston Churchill can get the job done, even in Britain’s Darkest Hour.
Friday, 15 May 2020
The Written Podcast: A Call From Another World?
Wednesday, 13 May 2020
TV Show of the Week: Jeopardy
With lockdown easing for many, there are still plenty who are still at home and whilst creativity have never been higher to vanquish boredom, sometimes we all need to take a chunk of time and relax in front of the TV, whether that be watching our favourite films and TV shows. I’ve been keeping myself busy over the past six weeks, and with the looming phone call to tell me I can return to work just around the corner, I just need to hang in there for the next couple of days. I believe I’ve found what can keep my mind active whilst I wait and that’s in the form of a TV show from my childhood… I know, I wasn’t expecting to write that either.
Jeopardy (not to be confused by the popular gameshow Jeopardy) was a live-action kids show that aired on CBBC, and even though it was labelled as a kids show, it certainly was the most adult kids show I watched as a kid, because of the intelligence, the scare factor, and the incredible story over the course of 3-seasons. Running from 2002 to 2004 (when I was between the ages of 8-10, at 4PM, after school every day, this show came on and me and my mum sat down and watched it together, both hooked on each episode.
Jeopardy follows the story of 8 secondary-school students and their teacher, who travel to Australian bush in search for UFOs. What was unique about this show was the homage to the found-footage genre, when the characters were given camcorders to record every day and any potential sightings. This gives the sense of realism and has been compared to the style of the Blair Witch Project, something that I did agree to the older I got and was man enough to handle the Blair Witch Project. Of course, those 8 students manage to capture more than just a sighting and end up in the middle of conspiracies and mysteries alike.
You might be thinking – why am I talking about watching a show from my childhood when I’m 26-years old, I must be truly getting desperate and bored with staying home. Well, what makes this show unique among all the others I watched as a child, is it held prominence over the years, because unlike other shows where I watched for the sake of watching because my mum allowed me time with the TV, this show was the first show with which I actually cared about the story and followed it tentatively. And, unfortunately, due to reasons I cannot remember, I never found out how it ended. I never found out the fate of those 8 characters. I’ve always sought out closure.
You might now be thinking that, why don’t I just google the Wikipedia article and read what happens, but I counterargue by stating that wouldn’t not be the same. Reading a synopsis on what happens is nowhere near the same to watching the show, following the details, and having complete closure on what happens. Until now. I have managed to track down all three seasons of the show, from episode 1 to the very end, and I would be lying if the child in me wasn’t excited about finally getting that long-awaited resolution.
As lockdown slowly eases and I’m waiting for that phone call, I think it’s the right time to binge-watch the entire show from start to finish, follow the stories of those 8 students 1 last time with the relief that I can finally find out what happens next.
Thanks for reading
Antony Hudson
(TonyHadNouns)
Monday, 11 May 2020
Mum’s Monday: What’s in a date?
Every single day has some significance to someone all over the world. Every single date is up for debate, mainly on which calendar to follow, be it the Gregorian Calendar or the Judicial Calendar. And there’s even different formats when displaying a date, which has caused many a debate over the years between English and American date format. Here in England, our date’s format is: 04/05/2020 – which when said aloud rolls off the tongue like so; the fourth of May, twenty-twenty. In America, their date’s format is: 05/04/2020 – which rolls of the tongue like so; May, the fourth, twenty-twenty, with the historical rationale that the month is the least important part, thus put second.
I chose the date 04/05/2020, not because of the cultural celebration of “may the fourth be with you,” a pun on the common phrase said in the Star Wars franchise, “may the force be with you”, but instead because it’s the date I’m writing this article on. However, to commemorate the date, whilst it’s difficult to find an official source of first use, an early use of the phrase was back in 1979 and was printed in the London Evening News. The Conservative party took out a full-page ad with the title, “May the Fourth Be With You”, celebrating that the then Prime Minister, Maggie Thatcher would be first elected. Of course, fans of the Star Wars franchise have taken on that phrase and used it to annoy those who have a birthday on that day.
Speaking of birthdays, every single date in the year has someone celebrating their birthday on it or recognising an historical birth or death on that day. Today, there’s approximately 17.7million people across the world celebrating their birthday. I will be among that average on 07/09/2020. Whilst it’s safe to say that it may not be the actual date itself, but the recognisable factor of it being the day you are born, but people do make that particular day special in some way, whether it be just a break from work and lounge about the house, go out to dinner, or have a massive party; it only comes round once a year (unless you’re the Queen).
Here in England, we have a selection of days known as Bank Holidays, which are a single day where business shut down. Known as a national holiday, traditionally started off as being purely for the banks, hence the name, the holiday has since become a country wide affair, except if you’re in the retail sector then there is no such thing as a bank holiday. In fact, there’s no such thing as a Boxing Day, either.
Although retail outlets and various other businesses remain in operation on some national holidays, there’s one which has much more of an impact, such as Christmas day, which is on the 25th of December, every year. The world has been celebrating Christmas day on 25th December every year since 336AD to correspond with the Roman Calendar, which was, at the time, Julian Calendar before we flipped over to the Gregorian Calendar. For 1,684 years, that date has always been Christmas, no matter what. The ideology of keeping the same date for Christmas when transitioning over hasn’t been for everyone. Although recognised by most countries, some Eastern Churches have kept the date exactly as it would appear in the Julian Calendar, meaning they celebrate Christmas on January 7th. Same celebration, different date. This brings forward an example of fluidity when it comes to what’s associated with a single date of any given year. Taking my birthday into account, if I were to celebrate it according to the Julian Calendar, it’ll be on 17/09/2020 – a Thursday – a difference of 11 days. When England adopted the Gregorian Calendar in 1745, Wednesday 2nd September was followed by Thursday, 14th September. And with it being a leap year, it included that extra day in February, totalling the number of days in that year to 355.
Leap years happen every four years, and it always occurs on February 29th. The reason why we do this is to synchronise our calendars with the solar calendar – the time it takes for our planet to orbit the sun. What we’ve done is rounded to the nearest day, when it actually takes 365¼ days to fully orbit the sun, hence why the leap year occurs every 4 years. If we never inserted the leap year since the beginning of the Gregorian Calendar, today’s date would not be 04/05/2020, but instead 17/08/2020, which is a 105-day difference.
Staying with calendars, this world is full of them – past and present, each one displaying their own timeframe. One of the most famous in recent history is the Mayan calendar, which caused quite a phenomenon across the world. The Mayan calendar dates back to the 5th century BCE, but some documents state that it wasn’t the Mayans who invented it, but the same system was used in pre-Columbia Central America, which notably predated the Maya. However, the Mayan’s adopted it, made it their own, and used it to calculate dates long into the future. As time went on and many calendars passed, changing the date to this and that, the day that was calculated for the Mayan calendar to end changed, too. It was calculated to end on 21/12/2012, 11:11AM, which inspired many to believe that was when the world would end. There have been many doomsday predictions throughout history, but none have had a film about it. Called “2012”, it’s about the end of the world. 21/12/2012 caused the world to be in hysterics; total panic, even seeing people build shelters to protect themselves from the “inevitable” end.
A date can be significant in lots of ways, whether for novelty reasons such as your wedding anniversary, sharing your first kiss, and/or from the perspective of an expectant mother a date can be when your baby is due, and whilst the first two are fixed and have some powerful connection (the third is technically a guess made by professionals because it is common for babies to be late, setting a new due date, subsequently a new birthday for the baby).
On the milder side of the spectrum, a date can be concrete because it’s the day your boss has set to have that incredibly important meeting. You’re expected to follow the Gregorian Calendar when planning for that meeting – you can’t state the reason for why you never showed because you’re following the Julian Calendar before leap years, setting the date of your boss’s meeting 105 days later. A date can be set for a feature film to release either in the cinema or on DVD, and the fans are stating they simply cannot wait for that date to come around. The same can be said about a booked holiday – once it’s booked, you’re counting down the days until you can run out of work and jump on that plane.
Sticking with the novelty, there are certain patterns that have been observed over the years, one in particular which has no ended and we won’t be seeing again in our lifetime. When we hit the 2001s, 01/01/01 – which would also be a bank holiday as it’s celebrated as New Year’s Day – has just enough uniqueness about it which those who are born on that day, or something else special happened, it feels different. My son, Antony, was born 05/05/1994. That meant on his 11th birthday, it was 05/05/05, something I know he would be happy about, as it’s a truly unique birthday. Sure, it was celebrated by many millions more as well, but being a part of that crowd should be recognised for what it was. This pattern lasted until 12/12/12, which was the very day my son passed his driving test, and another example of a novelty date. He has said he’ll never forget when he passed his test, because of that pattern. His world changed around him on that day, signifying that date to be something special to him as well.
Sadly, most of us would be seeing when the pattern begins anew, with 01/01/2101. However, those who are born today would be 81 years old, so more than likely can acknowledge it. That pattern would continue until ending with 12/12/2112, until restarting once again with 01/01/2201, and you get the idea. That is if we don’t switch over to another style of calendar beforehand, which is probably highly unlikely considering this Gregorian Calendar does work and have been working for hundreds of years.
So, to answer this article’s title question; what’s in a date? Well, first we must decide which calendar to use before we start putting some meaning on top of them, but since a good chunk of the world uses the Gregorian Calendar, it’s safe to say the following: there are some fixed meanings and some fluid meanings, but technically speaking a date can contain whatever we want, and certainly are more than just numbers.