During high school, I had a
massive pet peeve about how songs ended on CDs, by fading out. This bugged me
for quite some time, and really only grew stronger the more CDs I listened to
where the songs faced out instead of coming to a complete end. It was as if
there was more song to go, but we weren’t allowed to hear the end; we brought
the CD, but only received bits of the song. I spent my money on that CD, I
should have complete songs instead of fading away into nothingness. What only
increased the pet peeve’s strength was certain programs that showcased the
songs to promote the artist latest CD. We were allowed to listen to the entire
song then – so why are we given what essentially is a teaser for the album with
a song that ends properly only to have the exact same song fade away, as if the
promotion gave us more song than what the CD did – that to me, didn’t make any
sense.
What made things worse was when
some CDs had both unfading out songs and fading out songs all mixed together,
so some songs were complete, whereas others teased more song. If they were
capable of making sure some songs ended properly, then why not make all of them
do the same?
As the title of this article
implies, this was once my biggest pet peeve, meaning it has slid down the list.
As I’ve grown older, plenty more have taking have overtaken it. However,
occasionally, if I were listening to a song that I particularly enjoyed, it did
ruin my experience of said song by having it fade out, given the impression
there was more of what I was enjoying. If it had ended definitively, then I
would have enjoyed the song and can now move on to another or replay said song.
Now and again that pet peeve poked its head up to see just how much impact it
still had – turns out, it has quite a lot more impact yet.
So, instead of just complaining
about the songs fading out and claiming it’s a lazy way of ending a song, I thought
about finding an answer to the question. I did a bit of research and I found:
multiple answers. Unfortunately, there isn’t a definitive answer. There are
many reasons as to why a song fades away, and the one reason that stood out the
most was because the artist didn’t know how to end the song. OK, except, the
majority of the songs that faded away into nothingness were only but repeating
the chorus, so why not end the song after the chorus before it started fading away?
The other biggest reason was
because of artistic reasons, which I’m fine with. If the artists incorporate
the fade as part of their song, then that’s a definitive ending in my books. It
is hard to know when a song is using the fade in that way though, considering
about 99.9% of songs do just that, but there are a few that do stand out from
the rest, you just have to listen out for them.
The third main reason why the
fade is so popular is because the radio stations do it. The majority of songs
run longer than what the radio stations can allow, and so a fade is required
otherwise the DJs will run out of time with their segments between songs. We
listen to the radio more than CDs so the CDs are basically just copying what we’ve
become used to. No, we’re used to people talking after the song fades away.
Radio stations use the fade as a transition between the DJs talking.
Occasionally they use the fade to transition from one song to another, making
it easier for the listener. Constant endings can make for a clunky experience.
So are CDs preventing the listeners having a clunky experience by definitely ending
each and every one of their songs? The fade is used as a way of transitioning
from one song to another in such a way it doesn’t sound off. If that’s the
case, then why aren’t more people questioning when artists end their songs
instead of fading them out. Somehow, I’m not so sure that reason has the weight
it believes it does.
I do understand each reason
though and how it interweaved itself into certain CDs. However, I having a definitive ending to a song has more weight and impact than
fading the song out.
As strong as that pet peeve was
back when I was younger, I doubt it would be going away any time soon, and even
though my researching the reason why also hasn’t given me a definitive ending
to the matter, instead of just getting angry with the song that I’m enjoying
fading away into nothingness, at least I can apply one of those three reasons.
Them being lazy may well be the reason why the song is fading away, but at
least it’s an actual reason instead of me just jumping to conclusions and stating
it without actually knowing it is a real reason – as weird as that sounds.
I will always prefer songs that
have definitive ends, but if I can differentiate between those songs that use
the fading out for artistic reasons, then maybe I can reduce the strength of
the pet peeve some more.
Thanks for reading
Antony Hudson
(TonyHadNouns)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi, I hope you enjoyed reading my blog. Here, you can comment on what you liked about it or what changes you feel will best suit bettering your experience.