I’ve listened to a couple of
people’s opinions regarding this film, and they’ve both stated that Stuber is
basically a remake of Taxi, a 2004 film which itself is a remake of the 1998
French film of the same name. Having not seen Taxi, I had to take their word
for it, and also believe how bad it is. As I’ve only seen Stuber and not Taxi
(2004), I could only talk about the “wannabe remake” as one of the people I was
talking to, described it as. Upon doing a little research and read the plot of
Taxi (2004), I started to understand the parallels between Stuber and that
film. I also took note of the reviews Taxi had received and then realised I was
basically compiling an article focusing more on other people’s reviews about a
different film than my own about Stuber – and considering I hadn’t seen Taxi
(2004), I wouldn’t be offended if you told me I cannot disclose my opinion
about something I haven’t seen. To make things worse and add insult to injury,
I haven’t seen the original Taxi (1998), either.
This article wasn’t coming together
as authentic as I had hoped, but it did get me thinking. Stuber is a remake of
a remake, and if I hadn’t known that, this article probably would have been
easier to write as it would have been solely about the film without bringing in
anything I haven’t seen to the mix. But I now knew that it was a remake of a
remake, I had unintentionally make myself understood the connections between
this and Taxi (2004), there was no going back even if I sat down and re-watched
Stuber again; that knowledge would change how I perceived it the second time
round, without the already acquired knowledge of how the film’s storyline plays
out inside my head.
Stuber was only attempting to
bring a film series that many people nowadays haven’t seen at all or completely
forgotten after seeing the potential disaster that was the remake, into the
modern age. Sure it has a different name, but Uber has become an incredible
force within the Taxi world, so much so that regular taxi drivers have
publically complained heavily about the destructiveness it’s having on the Taxi’s
industry, so it’s only fitting that Stuber does the same with the film
franchise Taxi. That’s the way the world is now working, whether we like it or
not. Uber is not even mentioned on any of the Wikipedia articles about the Taxi
franchise, another fitting nod to the disconnection Uber has with the Taxi business…
I then made a second realisation
about how my article was going. Subtly ranting about an industry which doesn’t
affect me and strictly speaking has nothing to do with the film itself, is not
what I had expected.
With a strong cast, Dave Bautista
(fresh out of the MCU might I add), and Kumail Nanjiani (who’s film career has
increased rapidly over the last couple of years), playing Vic Manning and Stu,
respectively, Stuber does offer good comedic timing – even if the jokes do go a
little stale from frequent repetition. It’s a simple premise with a plainly
clear plot and end goal. Sure, it’s an R-rated film, with plenty of swearing
and blood and gore throughout, but it had the right amount to make sure that
you are awake to process what’s going on at that point in the story, which is
simple enough for you to catch up instantaneously so you don’t get confused and
switch it off half way through.
In the end I realised my article
far exceeded the 500 word goal I set myself with every film review and with not
feeling 100%, I decided to just leave everything I had written in the article
and release it onto my blog for you all to read.
Thanks for reading
Antony Hudson
(TonyHadNouns)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi, I hope you enjoyed reading my blog. Here, you can comment on what you liked about it or what changes you feel will best suit bettering your experience.