This is a tough article to write, I’m only now discovering. Last
night, when the opening titles began, I thought to myself, “I don’t want to
touch the previous series with a ten-foot pole.” This series is, once again, a
reboot of the show, meaning a few things have been twigged, and a couple of
these changes has proved that they BBC has listened to some of the complaints
they received from fans during the previous series. The challenge had a strong
premise that actually was original and intriguing. As I was watching the
episode, however, I found myself comparing it to the previous series, which was
something I didn’t want to do, nor did I want to compare it to The Grand Tour,
or the Top Gear that was before Chris Evans got his hands on it… see, I almost
did what I didn’t want to do.
However, I finally found a way I could write this article without straying
too far off the beaten track, and that’s by answering a question. If this was
the first series in the rebooted Top Gear, does it hold its own? I will accept
that I do need to stray into the slimy depths that was series 23, because generating
a coherent opinion forced me to, and I struggled to shake of its grip.
To answer the question, I believe that if this was the first series
of the rebooted Top Gear, a lot more people would tolerate it. No matter what
the BBC would have done, there would always be people complaining that Top Gear
is now ruined and would only ever watch The Grand Tour. However, there would be
a lot more people compared to the previous series that would have sat down and
gave it a fair chance. They would have gone through the process of being
surprised with the casting choice, and they would be fearful of any chances
that would come, because the slightest different from something they enjoy
ruins it, but I do believe this series does hold some considerable strength.
The first challenge of the series saw the three presenters, Matt
Leblanc, Chris Harris, and Rory Reid. Chris and Rory were hosts of Extra Gear,
a BBC Three exclusive mini-episode that could only be accessed either via the Red
Button or the iPlayer. They were an instant hit among fans and they were asking
for them to be the in the main show. They are good presenters. They know their
stuff, they have a natural chemistry, and it was a change that definitely
needed to happen to keep people interested.
Unfortunately, that means Matt Leblanc is the odd one out, because
he wasn’t an automotive journalist beforehand. There was a lot more chemistry
between Chris and Rory, because they had similar backgrounds, and so connected
more, but that doesn’t mean Matt shouldn’t be kicked off the show. He has
definitely stepped up his game, and I do believe that, as the series continues,
it will seem as if it does come naturally to him – is that too harsh… I feel as
if that’s too harsh. Matt wasn’t standing in Chris Evans forced shadow, and bumping
him up to main host allowed him to have a lot more freedom that before, and
that has also allowed him to be a lot more entertaining than before. He knows
his cars, he knows how to present; I do believe that will make for some funny
and entertaining episodes in the future.
The other major change that has occurred is resetting the track.
They’ve taken away the unnecessary off-road section and reverted back to the
one we all know and love, and the Star in the Reasonably Priced Car has been
changed to the Star in the Reasonably Fast Car, and the celebrity guest comes in
and has a much longer interview than before. Instead of having a section
dedicated to the celebrity alone, they brought them to the main couch and they
talked about car related stuff, and watched a film together. It wasn’t a formal
interview, more of a casual chat, but does it work? Well, yes, I think it does.
The celebrity interviews were the parts of Top Gear where I went off to make
myself a sandwich or something with them talking in the background. By taking away
that section and sprinkling it over the course of the show, it does have a nice
sense of freshness.
The main film of the episode was the challenge, and as I said before,
it had a strong premise. Matt, Chris, and Rory were tasked by the producers to
find and buy three cars that have driven to the moon and back, metaphorically
speaking. In other words, they needed to find three cars that have driven
upwards of 450,000 – 500,000 + miles in its lifetime, and the three challenges would
centre around reliability. They went to Kazakhstan with their chosen cars and
take a road trip in the hope of seeing a rocket launch at one of the oldest
launch sites in the world.
I can see what they wanted to do – start the series off with a
bang, and go big, and they certainly achieved that. The film was split into two
parts, and the challenges were reasonable and the editing was nice, and the
chemistry between the three presenters was entertaining. It had all the elements
that made it a good first episode. Except, instead of viewing the film with all
the pros and the unwanted cons force their way in by themselves, I struggled to
not see them, but then maybe I am still venting slightly over the previous
series.
The next important question I want to answer is, will I be watching
more of the series? Well, yes, I will. The BBC has made a good portion of the
changes the viewers were complaining about, and the episode was entertaining.
It wasn’t laugh-out-loud funny, more not-wanting-to-turn-it-off-because-I’m-actually-enjoying-this
funny. I do hope it gets better as the series continues, and I do believe it
can and will.
Thanks for reading
Antony Hudson
(TonyHadNouns)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi, I hope you enjoyed reading my blog. Here, you can comment on what you liked about it or what changes you feel will best suit bettering your experience.